Software profile

Front

Front is a shared inbox that turns team email addresses into a collaborative workspace. Instead of everyone forwarding messages from support@ or sales@ and hoping someone replies, conversations are assigned to a person, discussed internally with comments, and tracked to a resolution. It handles other channels too, but email remains its centre of gravity, which is what distinguishes it from ticket-first help desks.

What you can actually do with it

The everyday value is knowing who owns each message and being able to ask a colleague about it without leaving the thread.

  • Share team inboxes. Route shared addresses into one workspace where messages can be assigned, snoozed and archived, alongside each person’s individual mail.
  • Discuss privately in the thread. Internal comments and mentions sit next to the customer’s message, so context does not move to a separate chat tool and get lost.
  • Draft together. Colleagues can review or co-write a reply before it goes out, which is useful for sensitive accounts and for training newer staff.
  • Automate triage with rules. Route by sender, keyword, account or working hours, apply tags, and escalate automatically when something has waited too long.
  • Track service levels. Set response targets and see reply times, workload distribution and volume by tag, so bottlenecks are visible rather than anecdotal.
  • Bring in other channels and tools. SMS, chat, WhatsApp and social messages plus integrations with CRM, billing and internal systems, so account detail appears next to the conversation.
  • Use AI assistance. Drafting help, summaries, automated tagging and AI-handled routine replies, with quality checks on how those conversations went.

Who it fits best

It suits teams whose customer relationships run on email and involve several people: logistics and freight operators, professional services firms, wholesalers, travel companies, and account management or operations teams of roughly five to a few hundred people. It works particularly well where each customer has a named contact but colleagues need to cover for each other.

It is less compelling for self-service support at scale, where a traditional ticketing system with a large help centre is a better shape, and for very small teams where one or two people can manage a shared mailbox in Gmail with labels. If your volume is anonymous, high-frequency chat rather than named-account email, look elsewhere first.

Things worth knowing before you commit

  • Pricing is per seat with tiered features. Analytics depth, rule complexity, some AI features and API access sit on higher tiers, and there can be minimum seat counts. Confirm the current structure before budgeting.
  • Everyone has to move in. The benefits only appear when the whole team stops working from their own mail client. Partial adoption gives you two places to look and no reliable ownership.
  • Setup takes thought. Rules, tags and inbox structure need designing, and a badly organised workspace becomes as noisy as the mailbox it replaced.
  • Self-service is not its strength. There is a knowledge base, but if deflecting customers into help articles is your main goal, a support-first platform will do more.
  • It is another system holding customer email. Check retention, export and access controls with whoever handles your data protection obligations before routing your main addresses through it.

Alternatives to compare it against

Help Scout and Missive cover similar ground for smaller teams and cost less, with Missive strong on shared drafting and Help Scout leaning towards support. Hiver and Gmelius are worth comparing if you want shared-inbox behaviour layered directly onto Gmail rather than a separate application. Zendesk, Freshdesk and Intercom are the alternatives when you want ticketing, self-service and AI deflection more than collaborative email. And if the real problem is that nobody owns customer accounts, a CRM with email integration may address the cause rather than the symptom.

Plan tiers, seat minimums and pricing change regularly. Check Front’s own pricing page for the current details before deciding.

Further reading

Have you used Front?

One sentence is enough. Would you pick it again, and why or why not? We publish the critical reviews too — that is the point.

Contact BizBot to share your experience.

Compare this tool